Document Type

Article

Disciplines

Botany | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Evolution

Abstract

The many documented examples of parallel and convergent evolution in similar environments are strong evidence for the role of natural selection in the evolution of trait variation. However, species may respond to selection in different ways; idiosyncrasies of their evolutionary history may affect how different species respond to the same selective pressure. To determine whether evolutionary history affects trait-environment associations in a recently diverged lineage, we investigated within-species trait-environment associations in the white proteas, a closely related monophyletic group. We first used MANOVAs to determine the relative importance of shared response to selection, evolutionary history, and unique responses to selection on trait variation. We found that on average, similar associations to the environment across species explained trait variation, but that the species had different mean trait values. We also detected species-specific associations of traits to the environmental gradients. To identify the traits associated uniquely to the environment we used a structural equation model. Our analysis showed that the species differed in how their traits were associated with each of the environmental variables. Further, in the cases of two root traits (root mass and root length:mass ratio), two species differed in the direction of their associations (e.g. populations in one species had heavier roots in warmer areas, and populations in the other species had lighter roots in warmer areas). Our study shows that even in a closely related group of species, evolutionary history may have an effect on both the size and direction of adaptations to the environment.

Comments

This article was published as:

"The effect of historical legacy on adaptation: do closely related species respond to the environment in the same way?" R. Prunier, K.E. Holsinger and J.E. Carlson. Journal of Evolutionary Biology (25 (8) 1636-49 August, 2012.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02548.x

figure-1.png (929 kB)
Figure 1

figure-2.png (370 kB)
Figure 2

figure-3.png (233 kB)
Figure 3

figure-4.png (290 kB)

Share

COinS